Climate Change – Lost Intelligence

I have heard the rumblings again of Climate Change as it seems to have been given a fresh coat of paint. Biden is pushing the narrative hard as he sees his popularity plummet. A new crisis will soon take centre stage as COVID starts to lose its steam from a political lever. So with that, a short story on my thoughts on Climate Change which much like COVID is a bit of an IQ test.


When I first heard about climate change or global warming, I first thought, like many, this is something we may want to look into more. So me being me, I did just that.
I researched and read paper after paper and report after report, and soon, the pattern started to develop. What seemed to be the most vocal or concerned opinions expressed while I did my research were the political agendas and some pretty unscientific facts. It seemed the more substantive information was usually found buried in boring hard-to-read studies written by perhaps boring but intelligent people with lots of letters after their name.
But you see, when there is a crisis, there is a significant political opportunity; we have seen this with COVID to push global political agendas along, you know, the Big Reset. It seemed to become whoever was the loudest was heard and seemed to create the established and followed narrative or risk being called a climate hater. Case in point, in the early 2000s, Al Gore predicted that the ice caps would melt in 5 years based on what he saw while visiting the antarctic. His message, although seriously flawed, still seemed to stick and become the kickstart to the paranoia we now call climate change.
But when it was found out while he was visiting Antarctica, it was summer and what he observed were typical rates of melting during this time. Once the scientific community pointed this fact out, the much-called-for correction to his unfactual statement never happened, and it was left out there to perpetuate the climate change agenda.

When you look for the science, usually absent in the media unless supporting its narrative, a NASA study found that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.
According to official government data from the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Arctic Sea Ice is again GROWING, with current 2020 levels exceeding 8 out of the previous ten years.

NASA later revealed polar ice caps have not melted due to global warming. The latest revelation heavily contradicts what climate change alarmists consider definitive proof of the worldwide environmental crisis, whereby the current state of the polar ice caps has not receded since NASA started collecting satellite images of them in 1979.
Although much like we see in other climate observations where seasons would be called outliers to the patterned norm, there are years when the ice caps lost a bit of their size, they were able to bounce back in the following years quickly.
The polar ice caps came from a 30-year cooling trend, which ended during the late 1970s, making the polar ice regions significantly more significant than their past states in the previous decades. Again, this is why we cannot use even a hundred years of data as a guide since we are dealing with a dataset spanning billions of years.
Although they were abnormally large, the state of the polar ice caps in 1979 became the standard baseline in NASA’s study, which became the problem.

By 2005, a slightly constant decrease in the size of the polar ice caps was recorded. The analyst maintained that 10 percent wasn’t a significant loss despite the decline, especially since NASA’s observation baseline showed a considerable size for the polar ice caps. In addition, by 2012, the ice caps grew larger again and were even able to surpass their original size average in 1979.
Taylor noted that the recorded decrease from 2005 to 2012 is not enough to be considered as definitive proof of the effect of global warming on the Polar Regions. Instead, the reduction is only an indicator of the fluctuating environmental conditions that Earth is experiencing. Aside from only suffering an insignificant loss, the polar ice caps were still able to recover substantially.

So nothing is catastrophic, alarming, or even a little worrisome about this from what I can determine based on what science tells us. It puts to bed the “prophecies of doom” perpetuated daily across mainstream media. There seems to be a lot of grandstanding story on how science plus consensuses have magically combined for what would be the first time in history to deliver an unquestionable truth. However, the Arctic Sea Ice levels’ selective exclusion from mainstream climate articles should make you skeptical.
The predictive models used that are speculating all this so-called global warming. Obama’s Administration Department of Energy chief scientist Steven Koonin showed that the models relied upon by the Left to predict future global warming are so poor that they cannot even reproduce the temperature changes now. The models being used to create all this panic cannot even predict or produce past temperatures already known. So how can they predict temperatures decades into the future?

Another ignored observation is that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s analysis indicates that any negative economic impact that global warming eventually may have will be so modest that it warrants no action.
Another interesting tidbit that does not seem to see the light of day is that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the UN IPPC do not claim a link between global warming and natural disasters.
In 2020, the NOAA stated that it is premature to conclude with high confidence that increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations from human activities have had a detectable impact on Atlantic basin hurricane activity,” and “changes in tropical cyclone activity … are not yet detectable.” The science seems to be saying there lacks evidence to show that warming is making storms and flooding worse.”

The study further says that small changes in the temperature matter since moderately hot and cold temperatures caused 88.85 percent of the temperature-related deaths, while extreme temperatures caused only 11.15 percent.
So like COVID, we find ourselves in a topic that has become a political platform, forming a plan to support the “Reset”. Once again, I ask people to read and research and trust yet verify. We cannot blindly trust those who seek power and control using anything at their disposal to create fear and place them as our saviour. We must not let politics bully us into draconian rule through unfounded claims of a looming climate catastrophe. Know the facts. Global warming is not a problem.

An article someone sent me that I can assume was written in the mid to late 80s. Quite the doomsday read.


An article someone sent me that was written I am assuming sometime in the mid to late 80 on APNews. It reads “…

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.

He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.

As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.

Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.

″Ecological refugees will become a major concern, and what’s worse is you may find that people can move to drier ground, but the soils and the natural resources may not support life. Africa doesn’t have to worry about land, but would you want to live in the Sahara?″ he said.

UNEP estimates it would cost the United States at least $100 billion to protect its east coast alone.

Shifting climate patterns would bring back 1930s Dust Bowl conditions to Canadian and U.S. wheatlands, while the Soviet Union could reap bumper crops if it adapts its agriculture in time, according to a study by UNEP and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says. The atmosphere is retaining more heat than it radiates, much like a greenhouse…”

Full Article Here

As I try to figure out what is behind all this craziness, whatever the reason, whether it be a callous money grab or leverage for a global reset, it still involves cherry-picking data, dishonesty, and fraud.
“Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of the truth” — Albert Einstein.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s