All this talk about climate change, another scam and a complete and utter excuse for power, just like the so-called COVID pandemic, which is falling apart more and more every day. From the scandal of the Wuhan lab leak to the coercion and bribes that seem to solidify more and more with each passing day, so will the climate change lie. In the 50s, we were warned about another ice age, then that all got changed. If we are not getting colder, well, we must be headed for a global warming crisis. Then quick, let’s switch to the acid rain crisis; everything is about to crumble, and all the plants and trees will die! Well, that too never happened, then before anyone realizes that too, it’s a bloody hole in our ozone that will leave us all scorched and burned like crispy bacon. Jesus F, we are batting a thousand here, so now we have that old sack of oatmeal in the US and our own emasculated f-tard, Trudeau, with a renewed call to arms over the next “holly F we are all going to die crisis”. Now we have a much more broad-spectrum-catch-all crisis that for sure they hope they can scare the living poop out of everyone called “climate change.”
When I first heard about climate change or global warming, I first thought, like many, this is something we may want to look into. So me being me, I did just that.
I researched and read paper after paper and report after report, and soon, the pattern started to develop. What seemed to be the most vocal or concerned opinions expressed while I did my research were the political agendas and some pretty unscientific facts. It seemed the more substantive information was usually found buried in boring hard-to-read studies written by boring intelligent people with lots of letters after their name.
But you see, when there is a crisis, there is a significant political opportunity; we have seen with COVID is we see it being used to push global political agendas along, you know, the Big Reset. It seemed to become whoever was the loudest was heard and seemed to create the established and followed narrative or risk being called a climate hater. Case in point, in the early 2000s, Al Gore predicted that the ice caps would melt in 5 years based on what he saw while visiting the antarctic. His message, although seriously flawed, still seemed to stick and become the kickstart to the paranoia we now call climate change.
But when it was found out while he was visiting Antarctica, it was summer and what he observed were typical rates of melting during this time. Once the scientific community pointed this fact out, the much-called-for correction to his unfactual statement never happened, and it was left out there to perpetuate the climate change agenda.
When you look for the science, usually absent in the media unless supporting its narrative, a NASA study found that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.
According to official government data from the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Arctic Sea Ice is once again GROWING, with current 2020 levels exceeding 8 out of the previous ten years.
NASA later revealed polar ice caps have not melted due to global warming. The latest revelation heavily contradicts what climate change alarmists consider definitive proof of the worldwide environmental crisis, whereby the current state of the polar ice caps has not receded since NASA started collecting satellite images of them in 1979.
Although much like we see in other climate observations where seasons would be called outliers to the patterned norm, there are years when the ice caps lost a bit of their size, they were able to bounce back in the following years quickly.
The polar ice caps came from a 30-year cooling trend, which ended during the late 1970s, making the polar ice regions significantly more significant than their past states in the previous decades. Again, this is why we cannot use even a hundred years of data as a guide since we are dealing with a dataset spanning billions of years.
Although they were abnormally large, the state of the polar ice caps in 1979 became the standard baseline in NASA’s study, which became the problem.
By 2005, a slightly constant decrease in the size of the polar ice caps was recorded. The analyst maintained that 10 percent wasn’t a significant loss despite the decline, especially since NASA’s observation baseline showed a considerable size for the polar ice caps. In addition, by 2012, the ice caps grew larger again and were even able to surpass their original size average in 1979.
Taylor noted that the recorded decrease from 2005 to 2012 is not enough to be considered as definitive proof of the effect of global warming on the Polar Regions. Instead, the reduction is only an indicator of the fluctuating environmental conditions that Earth is experiencing. Aside from only suffering an insignificant loss, the polar ice caps were still able to recover substantially.
So nothing is catastrophic, alarming, or even a little worrisome about this from what I can determine based on what science tells us. It puts to bed the “prophecies of doom” perpetuated daily across mainstream media. There seems to be a lot of grandstanding story on how science plus consensuses have magically combined for what would be the first time in history to deliver an unquestionable truth. However, the Arctic Sea Ice levels’ selective exclusion from mainstream climate articles should make you skeptical.
The predictive models used that are speculating all this so-called global warming. Obama’s Administration Department of Energy chief scientist Steven Koonin showed that the models relied upon by the Left to predict future global warming are so poor that they cannot even reproduce the temperature changes now. The models being used to create all this panic cannot even predict or produce past temperatures already known. So how can they predict temperatures decades into the future? It’s as bad as our lockdowns that were based on a school project from a 14-year-old kid that was turned political then became law. I mean, you can’t make this shit up.
Another observation that seems to be not talked about is that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s analysis indicates that any negative economic impact that global warming eventually may have will be so modest that it warrants no action.
Another interesting tidbit that does not seem to see the light of day is that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the UN IPPC do not claim a link between global warming and natural disasters.
In 2020, the NOAA stated that it is premature to conclude with high confidence that increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations from human activities have had a detectable impact on Atlantic basin hurricane activity,” and “changes in tropical cyclone activity … are not yet detectable.” The science seems to be saying there lacks evidence to show that warming is making storms and flooding worse.”
While the Earth’s temperature has risen, natural disasters have become far less deadly. Since 1920, the planet’s temperature has increased by 1.29 degrees Celsius, and the world population has quadrupled from less than two billion to over seven and half billion. The International Disaster Database reports that the number of people killed by natural disasters has declined by over 80 percent, from almost 550,000 per year to less than 100,000 per year.
Also, did you know that climate change is a good thing? Some of the world’s best scientists believe that global warming will be beneficial rather than harmful. In 2017, a group of eminent scientists wrote that observations over the last 25 years show that warming from increased atmospheric CO2 will be benign. As we all learned in grade 5 science, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but a significant benefit to agriculture and other life on Earth.
A study published in 2015 by the British medical journal found that cold kills over 17 times more people than heat. Based on a study by 22 scientists that examined over 74 million deaths worldwide, the largest dataset ever collected was used to assess temperature-health association and reported that cold caused 7.29 percent of these deaths, while heat caused only 0.42 percent.
The study further says that small changes in the temperature matter since moderately hot and cold temperatures caused 88.85 percent of the temperature-related deaths, while extreme temperatures caused only 11.15 percent.
So like COVID, we find ourselves in a topic that has become a political platform, forming a plan to support the “Reset”. Once again, I ask people to read and research and trust yet verify. We cannot blindly trust those who seek power and control using anything at their disposal to create fear and place them as our saviour. We are our own saviour; we have minds, and I suggest we all use them. We must not let politics bully us into draconian action with unfounded claims of a looming climate catastrophe. Know the facts. Global warming is not a problem.
As I try to figure out what is behind all this craziness, whatever the reason, whether it be a callous money grab or leverage for a global reset, it still involves cherry-picking data, dishonesty, and fraud.
I wonder with what we know now, has climate change and the belief in its doctrine become an admission to ignorance?
The safest bet is to be your own fact-checker (as best you can), as “blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of the truth” — Albert Einstein.
The Canadian Truth Network 