Vindication in the Wake of the COVID-19 Revelations

Introduction: The Hook and the Heartbreak

They told me to “follow the science.” I did. They just followed the television.

In 2020 and 2021, as the COVID-19 pandemic raged, I immersed myself in research—not soundbites from CNN or any mainstream media, but dense peer-reviewed papers from scientists, doctors, and experts. My book, Post – Surviving Social Media Third Edition, captured my evolving views: skepticism about mRNA shots, lockdowns, testing flaws, and more. Backed by data analytics and tools I built, I challenged the narrative. For that, friends and family branded me a conspiracy theorist, isolating me like a pariah.

Now, in retrospect, the apologies are absent. No “Hey Mark, you were right.” Just silence. But as we see now, for anyone with a bloody brain, the evidence has mounted—U.S. investigations, international studies, admissions under oath—proving much of what I wrote was not only true but often underestimated the scale of the deception. This isn’t just “I told you so.” It’s a tragedy of broken trust: a deliberate operation that fractured families to push an experimental “cure” with hidden risks. What follows pairs my original claims with the vindicating truths that emerged, revealing something far more sinister than a virus.

Part 1: The “Gene Therapy” and DNA Integration.

In my book, I argued mRNA shots were not true vaccines but gene therapy, potentially altering our bodies. I referenced Moderna’s CMO Tal Zaks calling it “hacking the software of life,” and worried about reverse transcription into DNA.

The vindication came swiftly. The 2022 Lund University study by Aldén et al., published in Current Issues in Molecular Biology, showed Pfizer’s BNT162b2 mRNA enters human liver cells and reverse-transcribes into DNA in as little as six hours. Source: This in vitro evidence contradicted CDC claims that mRNA couldn’t alter DNA, proving the mechanism exists—worse than I imagined, as it challenged the “impossible” narrative used to silence skeptics. Source

Industry admissions amplified this. Bayer executive Stefan Oelrich, at the 2021 World Health Summit, described mRNA vaccines as “an example for that cell and gene therapy,” noting public refusal rates would have been 95% if pitched as such pre-pandemic. While some fact-checks called it a slip, the statement underscores how these shots were marketed as traditional vaccines to bypass scrutiny. Source

Part 2: The Lie of “Stopping the Spread” I called the vaccines “leaky,” unable to prevent infection or transmission, turning the vaccinated into unwitting test subjects. I warned that mandates rested on false promises of herd immunity. Oh, the heat I received from this was simply incredible.

Enter Pfizer’s October 2022 European Parliament hearing:

Executive Janine Small admitted the vaccine wasn’t tested for stopping transmission before rollout, saying they “had to move at the speed of science.” Source: This shattered the moral case for coercion—”protect others” or “stop the spread”—that ostracized me. Fact-checks note trials focused on symptoms, not transmission, but the admission confirms: the public was misled from day one. Source

Part 3: Botched Trials & The “Missing” DataI decried rushed trials, botched processes, and the elimination of control groups, destroying long-term safety comparisons.

The British Medical Journal’s 2021 investigation exposed this via whistleblower Brook Jackson at Ventavia, a Pfizer contractor: data falsification, unblinding, and ignored adverse events. Source: Jackson’s revelations highlighted systemic flaws in trial integrity. Source: Worse, post-EUA, Pfizer and Moderna unblinded control groups, vaccinating placebo recipients—erasing the ability to track differences over time. Source: As a 2021 Science article noted, this ethical “obligation” prioritized access over science, confirming my fears of ruined data. Source

Part 4: “Safe and Effective” vs. The Reality of Harm

I warned of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), heart issues, clotting, and spike protein toxicity, especially in low-risk groups like young men.

Post-rollout data revealed historic excess mortality. A 2024 Society of Actuaries report showed U.S. excess deaths 3-7% above baseline in 2023, with variations by age; working-age spikes in 2022-2023 aligned with insurance data trends. Source A 2024 BMJ Public Health study found excess mortality in 87-91% of countries from 2020-2022, often non-COVID related. Source

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo’s 2024 guidance halted mRNA vaccines, citing DNA fragments (plasmids) risking genomic integration—echoing my “addictive DNA” concerns. Source: Critics called it “faulty science,” but it spotlighted contamination issues. Source: The CDC admitted mRNA links to myocarditis, highest in males 12-29, in 2021 updates and ongoing reports. Source: A 2024 MMWR study assessed sudden cardiac risks post-vaccination. Source

Part 5: My claim that Fauci was “full of sh*t” and “paid off,” tied to gain-of-function research, was met with such disdain and hate.

The 2023-2024 House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic grilled him. Fauci’s June 2024 testimony faced scrutiny over emails showing private lab-leak suspicions while publicly dismissing them. Source: The subcommittee’s December 2024 final report criticized public health responses, including origin suppression. Source

OpenTheBooks investigations revealed NIH scientists pocketed $710 million in royalties from 2010-2021, including from Moderna during the pandemic—fueling conflict-of-interest claims. Source Fact-checks dispute the exact figure for pandemic years, but payments to 44 NIH scientists from Moderna were confirmed. Source

These are only the overarching claims I made in my book, which I wrote in 2020; there were many more, each of which has come true, supported by empirical evidence; still, silence from those who threw stones.

Conclusion: The Twist and the True Cost

The papers I cited—VAERS, unblinded trials, transmission gaps—are now congressional records and journal staples. But the diabolical twist? This wasn’t incompetence; it was a psychological operation hiding experimental gene therapy behind “safe and effective.” Mandates divided us, profits soared, and trust eroded.

Being right put strain on my from my family. Yet, as history rewrites this era, perhaps silence will break.

For now, this is my testament: Question everything, or pay the price.