Bayer’s top executive admitted that if it were not for the COVID mRNA being labelled as a vaccine, thanks to the CDC’s rewriting its’ of a vaccine, the COVID “vaccine” more than likely would not have been accepted as “safe” as it would have been labelled as a gene therapy. He is recently quoted as follows:
“And for us, therefore, we are taking that leap — us as a company Bayer — in cell and gene therapy, which to me is one of these examples, where we are really going to make a difference, hopefully, moving forward.” “Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example of that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say that if we had surveyed two years ago in public, ‘would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ we would probably have a 95% refusal rate. I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in a way that was maybe not possible before.”
Fact Check-Bayer executive’s comments were misinterpreted in social media posts.
THE SCIENCE: Reuters previously addressed false claims that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are a form of gene therapy or that the vaccines alter the recipient’s DNA. While mRNA vaccines by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna can be considered a genetic-based therapy because they use genetic material, a piece of RNA based on SARS-CoV-2, to prompt an immune response in recipients, this is not the same as gene therapy, which is designed to permanently change the body’s genetic makeup, experts have told Reuters.
Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: Where do I begin? First, the entire “public health” establishment and the mainstream media’s censorship-promoting “fact checkers,” as we see in this example, continue to maintain, and have done so even before the mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines were available, scientists knew with absolute certainty, mRNA from the vaccines cannot alter human DNA. However, the arguments used to support these claims are complete bullocks. The media’s “fact checkers” have claimed that mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are not gene therapy while, at the same time, and self-contradictorily, in attempting to reassure the public that the technology used in these vaccines is not new, they reference years of prior research and development of mRNA technology for, say it with me “gene #@$ing therapy.” Let’s be clear: The criterion for whether the information is to be suppressed is not factual accuracy but whether it aligns with the specific government policies, such as the policy goal of increasing demand for COVID‑19 vaccines. Our dictator calls anything that does not align with supporting the uptake of the vaccine’s disinformation, and you know what happens to people who dispel disinformation? You get thrown in jail or called the “fringe minority.” Well, listen up fucktard, it’s 2023, and we have lost patience for those who continue to feel the V is safe and promote it to the public and our children. With any luck, many will spend 2023 behind bars for crimes against humanity.