The number one cause of death in provinces across Canada is “unknown causes.” In 2018, the numbers for Alberta skyrocketed with an almost 700% increase, rising from only 150 in 2018 to 1044 in 2019. Between 2018 and 2021, there has been a 4000% increase, and the numbers are still increasing. Some reports are circulating that no autopsy is performed if a deceased person is vaccinated. I can only speculate why this is, but in most cases, an autopsy would determine the cause of death. Therefore, with no reasons for these deaths, at the volumes being reported, why are autopsies not being made compulsory?
Decades ago, hospitals were required to perform autopsies on a certain proportion of decedents to maintain their accreditation. A classic study of 100 randomly selected autopsies from each of three years (1960, 1970 and 1980) revealed that significant diagnoses had been missed in about 22% of cases in all three eras, despite the introduction of modern imaging methods. Today, with few profits that can be gained from performing autopsies, we now only see them being performed about 5% of the time, which given the potential autopsies that could be achieved, there stands to be much to gain.
If we were to perform more autopsies, especially when no COD is listed, we could at least discover if we have an issue with specific vaccine batches. We also need to ensure the autopsies are performed correctly, whereby they intend to rule out known adverse reactions, blood clots and myocarditis being a few. I find it shocking that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and our government are not demanding autopsies or testing of vaccine samples. It is impossible to declare a product safe and effective without obtaining direct evidence from potential victims.
The manufacturers are protected against product liability, thanks to those lopsided contracts our governments sighed with Pfizer and Moderna. There is still accountability of the government agencies charged with protecting us, the employers, and the educational system coercing employees or students to take an experimental, potentially dangerous, or even lethal product.
As Dr. Edeling stated, “In this global catastrophe, we have people expressing opinions and instructions – relying on their authority to do so, but not relying on reasons. And by not relying on reasons, they are neither relying on facts, nor on science, nor on logic.”
What has caused this is the suppression of science. In essence, we have abandoned something that medicine has relied on, which is the principles of evidence-based medicine that, until COVID, has stood the test of time. Science has been replaced with extractions, opinions, and authority, not relying on reason. By not depending on reason, they are not following science, facts, and logic. A real-life example of this would be the continuation of the mRNA gene therapy that has yet to be proven through science of its efficacy and safety. We have ignored warnings from VAERS, relying on the guidance of the oligarchs who continue to profit from this catastrophic failure.
The fact there has never been a global vaccination on this scale, one would think more transparency and governance would have been in place. Rather than rely on VAERs for being the early warning system, we would have had a global warning system capable of identifying patterns of concern regarding adverse reactions. Additionally, more post-mortems would have been conducted to rule out any potential issues that, if done, would have negated articles like this.
Another massive issue that has not had many discussions was that vaccinations happened during the pandemic. Usually, vaccines would be introduced ahead of the exposures. From what we know of the mRNA and its effect on the immune system, some experts are reporting that people may have already been battling COVID, taking the mRNA, impeding their innate immune system and allowing COVID to take over and replicate further. In 91 countries around the world, following the rollout of vaccination, spikes in Covid-19 cases and spikes of Covid-19 deaths were observed. These documents have graphs which come from each of the countries. It was well documented and observed that their immune system would undergo a period of immune suppression two weeks after one was vaccinated. More people die for two to three weeks, and more people get the virus.
As discussed in many of my articles, it is worth repeating here. As they have been coined, these vaccines are not vaccines at all. Vaccines have been with humanity for ages. Vaccines are dead or attenuated – attenuated means weakened – organisms or pathogens given to a person to which the body then mounts an immune response. These vaccines have been proven and have worked for decades. These so-called mRNA vaccines are not vaccines. They are entirely different. If vaccines are a car, then the mRNA is a flower, not even remotely the same. What they are is new scientific development created in a laboratory to produce messenger RNA sequences which are put together so that when they’re injected, they get incorporated into the cells. They then instruct cells to produce coronavirus spike protein. So, the thing that is injected is not the pathogen; it’s a genetic messenger that makes cells manufacture spike protein, which is produced in cells and presented to the body in the blood. That is entirely different from the method of a standard vaccine. But as mentioned before, the CDC covertly changed the definition of a vaccine.
These mRNA vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system. This can occur in any organ resulting in myocarditis, sudden cardiac arrest, and death. Microscopic examination of tissue shows clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs, which supports much of what many are saying.
In early 2020, three pathologists, two of whom are medical examiners, published their findings n an early online release article, “Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose,” in the Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. The authors’ findings were conclusive, stating that two teenage boys were pronounced dead in their homes three and four days after receiving the second Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 dose. There was no evidence of active or previous COVID-19 infection. The teens had negative toxicology screens for drugs, and poisons were present in their bodies). These boys died from the vaccine. Histopathological examination of their cardiac tissue revealed an important new finding: Neither heart demonstrated evidence of typical myocarditis. Instead, the authors found evidence of microscopic changes consistent with a different form of heart injury called toxic cardiomyopathy. The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis. It has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy, which is problem-related to the heart muscle.
There is growing outrage by those brave enough to step forward against the oligarchs demanding that more autopsies are performed to either confirm or rule out these findings caused by the mRNA vaccine.
Many highly accredited people have performed many studies that have clearly shown some well-known problems with mRNA gene therapy. Through autopsies conducted on those who died after receiving the mRNA:
mRNA vaccines do not stay at the injection site; instead, they travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs, mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs, vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation, vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcomes.
Pathology remains the gold standard for proof of disease causation, and after some critical findings on autopsy materials from patients who died within days to several months after vaccination. I will sight a few of the studies conducted.
Prof. Burkhardt is a very experienced pathologist from Reutlingen, Germany. With the help of his colleague Prof. Walter Lang, he has studied numerous cases of death which occurred within days to several months after vaccination. In each of these cases, the cause of death had been certified as “natural” or “unknown.” Burkhardt became involved only because the bereaved families doubted these verdicts and sought a second opinion. It is remarkable, therefore, that Burkhardt found not just a few but the majority of these deaths due to vaccination.
While all four major manufacturers of gene-based vaccines were represented in the sample of patients studied by Burkhardt and Lang, most patients had received an mRNA vaccine from either Pfizer or Moderna. Some of the deceased patients had received both mRNA- and viral vector-based vaccines on separate occasions.
Pfizer’s own animal experiments show that the vaccine quickly distributes throughout the body. To cause potentially lethal damage, the mRNA vaccines must first spread from the injection site to other organs. That such distribution occurs is apparent from animal experiments reported by Pfizer to Japanese authorities with its application for vaccine approval in that country . Rats were injected intramuscularly with a radioactively labelled model mRNA vaccine, and the movement of the radiolabel first into the bloodstream and subsequently into various organs were followed for up to 48 hours.
What about the autopsies that have been performed? Several have published their findings, and I spent a reasonable amount of time searching them out. They are not easily found, at least ones that are relatable to this topic. Of the autopsies that have been done postmortem mRNA treatment, that has been few, as we have seen, their outcomes have been interesting. I found that the outcomes of these autopsies are written so that most laypeople will have no idea what they are saying. Most will deduce their findings are absolute and sound, but if you take the time to dissect what they are saying, it seems to result in a lot of subterfuge. Let’s look at one posted on PubMed where it read.
Conclusions: The myocardial injury seen in these postvaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances differ from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.
On the surface, this seems quite scientific and sound, but when you try to make sense of those big scientific words, it paints a picture that is far from desirable or complete. Let’s look at this piece of the scientific word salad “catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy.” Translated, this means a novel syndrome of heart failure precipitated by acute emotional or physical stress. The primary difference between this type of myocardial injury and the “typical” infarction is that this type of injury is reversible, whereby the presence of plaque rupture and coronary thrombosis are absent. I found out more about this and what they do not discuss. What they are describing is what they call stress cardiomyopathy or SCM. Plasma catecholamine levels are markedly elevated in some patients with SCM. The syndrome has been observed in other clinical states of catecholamine excess such as central neurologic injury and pheochromocytoma. Another observation that has been seen is abnormal myocardial blood flow due to sympathetically mediated microvascular dysfunction decreasing coronary flow reserve during the acute phase of this syndrome. The outcome then refers to something they call a cytokine storm. On the surface, this also sounds quite clinical, but it is not since “cytokine storm” has no definition.
It denotes a hyperactive immune response characterized by the release of interferons, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, chemokines, and several other mediators. As I researched this term, I found this uncovered a lot of grey areas that did not seem to come to a consensus. I found that many felt the term cytokine storm might be misleading. Incorporating a poorly defined pathophysiological entity lacking a firm biological diagnosis may increase uncertainty. Some further suggest that although the term cytokine storm conjures up dramatic imagery and has captured the attention of the mainstream and scientific media, the data does not support its use. In summary, from what I can determine, the conclusions of the autopsies I am seeing are nothing more than much scientific theatre to satisfy the media’s appetite and those who like to point to published studies to deflect the underlying truth.
What I described was repeated many times as I conducted my research. Admittedly, at first, I was convinced there was nothing overtly concerning. Still, once I read one that seemed to have a pattern in words used and perhaps were almost exaggerated, I became suspicious, which resulted in further dissection of the observations.
This brings me full circle in my thinking that there is a massive need for postmortems for those who have died, with no COD being determined to ultimately determine COD and rule out the many suspicions circulating and being voiced in the pages of this article. I am truly troubled why there is no more coming forward about this because there are so many dying without cause being known. If not for purely scientific curiosity alone, for strictly pathological reasons. Is it not better to know the truth, even if it causes uncomfortableness than to not know and have not learned?