In this article, I want to talk about something I have been mentioning over the last while about the actual existence of COVID. There have been plenty of people who have talked about this but I was truly skeptical and seemed to avoid looking into it. I was shocked once I did because what I found was some pretty overwhelming evidence that questions its existence. I would suggest you do your own research and I would be interested in what you found and your thoughts on this. So with that, let’s get into it.
In reality, what the CDC did was find a unicorn. By simply using a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn, then adding that information into a computer to re-create or simulate the unicorn. This research is not new, but we usually do not then claim a computer re-creation is the actual disease unless it can be, as can best be described as seen in the wild in its entirety. To many, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud be.
Through over ten freedom of information acts requests to 10 countries, including Phizer requesting proof that any requested possessed isolates of COV2. I have read over 30 FOIs from all over the World, and to date, not one respondent was able to show they possessed a living sample of COVID.
This is not new whereby doctors and scientists have been saying
Covid19 has never been “isolated,” and the CDC has had no proof all along. But there are no studies that prove it. A growing number of well-known and highly regarded medical professionals and scientists feel this entire thing is a trillion-dollar hoax to force people to take vaccines as part of a very dark and subversive agenda.
This fabrication of a pandemic smells of a plot to take down our existing economic systems, force people into isolation with the draconian rule, cause countless harm to our bodies, mental health, and the loss of small businesses everywhere.
As we are seeing pan out now supports some of the claims made years ago that were considered tinfoil hat stuff. The vaccines themselves are engineered to attach to NANO and jump from person to person. Five years ago, it was reported the vaccine itself contains covid19 (which contains Nano AI, which is now circling the globe in billions of people.
The slanted methodology applied under WHO guidance for detecting the alleged spread of the virus is the Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR), which is routinely used all over the World.
The RT-PCR test has been used Worldwide to generate millions of erroneous “Confirmed Covid-19 cases”, which are then used to sustain the illusion that the alleged pandemic is Real.
This assessment based on incorrect numbers has been used in the course of the last 20 months to spearhead and sustain the fear campaign.
And people are now led to believe that the Covid-19 “vaccine” is the “solution”. And that “normality” will be restored once the entire population of Planet Earth has been vaccinated.
“Confirmed” is a misnomer: A “Confirmed RT-PCR Positive Case” does not Imply a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”.
“Today, as authorities test more people, there are bound to be more positive RT-PCR tests. This does not mean that COVID-19 is coming back or that the epidemic is moving in waves. More people are being tested, that’s all.”
The debate on false positives (acknowledged by the health authorities) points to so-called errors without necessarily questioning the overall validity of the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the alleged spread of the CoV-SARS-2 virus.
The RT-PCR test does not identify/ detect the virus. The PCR test identifies genetic fragments of numerous viruses (including influenza viruses types A and B, and coronaviruses which trigger common colds).
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can return positive because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
Dr. Pascal Sacré concurs: “These tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.”
To determine the viral load, sequences are then amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject to sterility errors and contamination.
It’s worth noting when COV2 was first worked on and they needed to detect it, a cycle threshold of 18 was used and was found more than sufficient to detect the viral load.
The PCR Test does not identify the virus as outlined above. Moreover, the WHO in January 2020 did not possess an isolated and purified sample of the novel 2019-nCov virus.
Moreover, the study, published by Eurosurveillance acknowledges that the WHO did not possess an isolated and purified sample of the novel 2019-nCov virus:
What this ambiguous statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” (aka infection resulting from the novel 2019 coronavirus) would be validated by “the close genetic relatedness to the 2003-SARS-CoV.”
This means that the SARS coronavirus detected 19 years ago is being used to “validate” the identity of a so-called “novel coronavirus” first detected in China’s Hubei Province in late December 2019. The WHO did not have in its possession the “virus isolate” required to identify the virus. In their wisdom, the WHO decided an isolate of the new coronavirus was not required.
Freedom of Information (FOI) requests sent to ninety Health /Science institutions in many countries confirm no record of isolation and purification of SARS-CoV-2 has not been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.
As of this writing, none of the 90 Health /Science institutions that have responded have provided zero responses that would demonstrate isolations of the virus ever happening.
More on the dreaded Cycle Threshold:
The number of amplification cycles should be less than 35, preferably 25-30 cycles. But this I find hard to believe since when they were first trying to model COVID, scientists found 18 cycles more than sufficient to detect what was needed clearly. Many feel anything over 25 will provide many false positives, and over 30 and 25, useless results. In the case of virus detection, many studies report 35 cycles or more will only detect signals unrelated to an infectious virus. I have heard these also described as dead particulates.
The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
If the PRC test is conducted at a 35 Cycle Threshold or higher, which the WHO originally recommended, genetic segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected. This means that ALL “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” tabulated Worldwide in the last 22 months are invalid.
The WHO now calls for retesting, which translates to saying “We Screwed Up”. That recommendation is Pro-forma. It won’t happen. Several billion people Worldwide have already been tested, starting in early February 2020. Nonetheless, we must conclude estimates (according to the WHO) are invalid and anyone who has become informed unless retested.
From the outset, the PCR test has been routinely applied at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher. This happened even after the January 2020 recommendations of the WHO to use a much lower cycle threshold.
This means that the PCR methodology applied Worldwide over these almost two years led to the compilation of faulty and misleading Covid statistics. So basically, if you want another “COVID wave”, test more. Unfortunate for us, but perhaps not for those who wish for this lie to continue into perpetuity. This reality has all led to what many call “the casedemic”
Was the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic a Dress Rehearsal?
This is not the first time this has heppened, In 2009 a H1N1 pandemic allegedly affecting 2 billion people was carried out by the WHO. Corruption at the highest levels of the WHO: Several critics including Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg confirmed that the H1N1 Pandemic was “Fake”
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” (Michael Fomento, Forbes, February 10, 2010). Fast forward over a decade, and there is now even more sinister partners in all this. With big tech and social media all connected through a tapestry of connecting the dots, the money trail leads a pathway to each other’s right-hand pocket. Over the next few years, estimates are trillions of dollars that will either be spent or made. Then, the power is up for grabs for those with the stomach to turn their back on morality. Once conservative, democratic societies will turn into socialist, communist dictatorships.
The PCR Test is the Smoking Gun. It invalidates Everything.
There is no such thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. The entire data bank is invalid. At the time of writing, the number of tabulated so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” is of the order of 260 million Worldwide. These numbers are meaningless.
None of this data can be categorized as “Confirmed.”
The PCR Test does not identify the novel virus, and it was never designed to. Even the inventor of the test a Kary Mullis warned us of this. He was all over social media explaining this, but now he has died that some call suspicious. I would have to agree as he had a lot of enemies as he was pretty intelligent, and people were listening to him. The genetic fragments of an alleged similar 2003 coronavirus, SARS, cannot be used as a means to identify the virus now, nor can it be used to identify the deadly variants.
Moreover, according to the Freedom of Information (FOI) study quoted above, the isolate of the novel coronavirus is unconfirmed.
Sustained by the complexities of lies, the covid-19 narrative is exceptionally fragile. This consensus relies on fake science and an invalid data bank of alleged “confirmed Covid-19 cases”.
How did Big Pharma manage to develop a vaccine (sponsored by the WHO, GAVI, the Gates Foundation) with a mandate “to protect people” against a virus which has not been isolated or purified from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?
Through all this, the virus has yet to be identified. Moreover, 2019 SARS-CoV-2 has been categorized as similar to the 2003 SARS-CoV, which means that the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 is not a novel virus.
The legitimacy of the Covid vaccine project hinges upon the validity of hundreds of thousands of RT-PCR fake positive cases Worldwide combined with fake Covid related mortality data. ( See Michel Chossudovsky, Does the Virus Exist)
So what do we know:
National governments have announced a Fifth Wave, focusing on the alleged “deadly variants” of SARS-CoV-2, including the Delta variant.
However, testing will be ramped up using lower CT for the vaccinated and higher for the unvaccinated. This is done to promote the vaccine’s efficacy that is dropping fast the Biden’s popularity. The PCR test neither detects the virus nor the variants of the virus. The variant is a scam since how do they identify these variants?
There is no isolate of the novel coronavirus on record. Moreover, the WHO’s customized PCR test uses a proxy similar 2003 SARS-CoV virus (which no doubt has mutated extensively over the last 19 years).
Restrictions would have to be reintroduced the Delta variant poses a higher risk of hospitalizations.
These announcements justify a continuation of repressive policy measures, the speeding up of the vaccination program, and the repression of the protest movement.
Just as a side note, as we talk about mRNAs, that are used in this so called vaccine, I have been calling what Phizer created gene therapy. I found a paper that talks about the mRNA in how it works with it’s nano technologies used to deliver the spike proteins and it reads as follows: “…They are enormously important in therapeutics, driving medicine forward, and have been used in numerous clinical trials for anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, antifungal, and anaesthetic drug delivery as well as for the delivery of gene therapies…”
It goes on further to describe the delivery system to explain it’s challenges, which we are perhaps witnesses today with the failing efficacy of the “vaccines”. “…Despite their benefits, liposomes have a couple of disadvantages: they have a short circulation time in blood stream, are unstable in the human body, and lack selective targeting. ..”
I am sure you have heard about the graphene that is said to be in blood samples taken from vaccinated people. Objects that shouldn’t be part of any vaccine and that aren’t declared among the components of the vaccines. Additionally, other types of objects have been identified and evidenced in images of blood samples from people vaccinated with coronavirus vaccines. Specifically, micronadators, crystallized graphene nanoantennas, and the famous graphene quantum dots, also known as GQD. On this occasion, analyzing one of the images obtained by Dr. Campra, I remember seeing this, corresponding to a sample of the Pfizer vaccine. See Figure 1, which is this one here, has discovered what’s most likely a nano-router or part of its circuitry.
I will have a separate blog post about the nano-technoloy that was used in the “vaccine” along with the graphene that is used. We need to keep in mind that graphene and its derivatives, graphene are part of the components of vaccines, according to what has already been stated in this blog. The properties of graphene are exceptional from the physical point of view, but also thermodynamic, electronic, mechanical and magnetic. Its characteristics allow its use as a superconductor, electromagnetic wave absorbing material, emitter, signal receiver, quantum antenna, which makes it possible to create advanced electronics on a nano and micrometric scale.
Such is the case, that it is the fundamental nanomaterial for the development of nano-biomedicine, nano-communication networks, new drug delivery therapies and treatments against cancer and the neurological treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. However, all the benefits aside, the scientific literature is very clear regarding the health implications for the human body. It is well known that graphene and other derivatives such as carbon nanotubes are toxic in almost all their forms, causing mutagenesis, cell death and the release of free radicals into the body. I read a lot about free radicals and the harm then pose to the human body whereby bioflavonoids are needed to combat them. Free radicals are the catalyst to all forms of sickness including cancer. This topic needs a separate post to fully delve into the matter, but the point I wanted to make is that if the “vaccine” is so piss poor at what it was intended to do, its design methods right out of the gate, pretty much guaranteed it’s a failure, what was is the real purpose?
When I started researching about COVID and the statements I kept seeing that it does not exist, I thought for sure I would be met with hysterical tin-foil-hat kind of articles describing the world is flat, man never went to the moon and 911 was an inside job. What I was meant with was an avalanche of published papers written by reputable scientists, virologists and other professionals. Documents that had substantive documentation backing up their statements. More so, I could not find one shred of evidence to debate or even argue what these people were reporting. With so much data pointing to something that at the very least answers to what many are reporting needs to happen. I have said this before, with so much happening that leaves me with my jaw wide open, I honestly feel anything is possible. I am convinced that with respect to COVID the numbers do not support a pandemic and when we qualify the numbers, they are similar to those of the Flu.
To change my mind, I would need to see a sample, fully intact, taken from a human isolate of the COVID virus. It is fact, without that, you are simply guessing when it comes to developing a vaccine and when you are testing for it. We have locked down the world economy based on a computer model of what we have been led to believe is COVID, but we can’t see it, we can only assume its existence.
This would be like being run over by a boat, and long after the boat is gone, you try to develop a profile of the boat based on the wake it left. You could determine some basic characteristics as it floats, has a motor and a few other obvious characteristics, but that would be it. You would have no idea of engine size, how many people were on board, was it a fishing boat or a houseboat. You get my point, we are being lied to and expected to follow along like good citizens and take our jab.
I suggest we bring more light to this situation. We need to have more people asking questions, asking why. If we simply trust and never verify, then we rely on those who have one agenda, and that is not the health and welfare of the people.
Trust yet verify, stat uncensored.
Here is just one of the FOI reuqestions: