I have looked into the issue of vaccinated versus unvaccinated and positive cases reporting between the two. I have discovered some fundamental flaws in their reporting in their efforts to bolster the adoption of the vaccine.
The PCR test and its inherited flaws were never designed or meant to be used in the manner it is today. This fact was told to the C.D.C. by the inventory of the test. Also, there are wrong methods how they are conducting the tests, resulting in many false positives. The issue is the Cycle Threshold used and how it makes great headlines, which seems to be a pattern.
The C.D.C.’s calculations suggest that detecting any live virus in a sample above a threshold of 33 cycles is challenging. The C.D.C. has been deceptive in stating data shows that using 40 or even 37 cycles will result in massive amounts of positive diagnoses that ought to be negative.
As I dug further, I found out the C.D.C. didn’t just have, as they said, “extreme difficulty” finding any live virus in samples whose cycle threshold was above 33. They were straight-up unable to find any. The C.D.C. issued guidelines for COVID-19 testing that their research shows are bound to mean that many people not infected by the virus would get test results falsely saying they were.
Observed and reported, as high as 80% of the reported positive cases were false positives. The vast majority of positive cases were more than likely only symptomatic, meaning they were not sick. This fact would explain why the recovery rate is so high and almost equal to the positive cases reported.
In all their wisdom, governments are using this flawed method to determine if the unvaccinated are testing positive more than the vaccinated. So this is where the issue gets interesting.
Many reporters and even a few brave doctors are reporting this to be true than we may believe. What may be going on right now is disgusting and dishonest. Daniel Horowitz wrote at Blaze Media that the new C.D.C. guidelines for “COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation” – meaning people who tested positive after getting vaccinated – says PCR tests should b;.JNe set at 28 C.T. or lower. The stated reason for the 28 C.T. maximum is to avoid false positives on vaccinated people, discouraging acceptance of the vaccines.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests, the most commonly used to diagnose COVID, amplify tiny virus strands in cycles. Before I continue, I try to explain what the PCR test is and the Cycle Threshold. There’s an inverse relationship between viral load and contagion and the number of cycles necessary to detect the virus. So a lower number of cycles required to detect the virus indicates a higher viral load and infectiousness. A higher number of cycles indicates less viral load, and in some cases, it may mean a dead virus from an infection that is not currently contagious.
A 28 C.T. means the tested material is amplified or doubled 28 times.
This is another example of ‘following the science’ only when it suits a political purpose; to wit, C.D.C. does not recommend the lower threshold for anyone tested. False positives must be avoided to encourage vaccinations, but false positives to prevent children from attending school or maintaining other government restrictions seem OK with C.D.C.
Last summer, the New York Times reported that C.T.s above 34 rarely detect live viruses but, most often, dead nucleotides that are not contagious. In many provinces, we have seen here in Canada thresholds of 38, 40 and even higher being used to report cases.
As a result, we have seen entire families or small businesses forced into quarantine because someone tests “positive” for the virus without exhibiting any symptoms. Lives and businesses are destroyed without any due process or evidentiary standards that they are even infected.
Those who seem to be steering this ship have suddenly discovered the power of cycle thresholds on PCR. It’s almost like the inner circles of those who have become part of this secrecy and lies have become a bigger problem than the virus itself for reasons I cannot understand. The situation we are seeing now is, and let me be clear, this has not been confirmed, but from what I have seen over the last several months, what may seem to be tin-foil-hat stuff at first blush, has ended up to be accurate, so nothing is off the table these days.
It seems when PCR tests are conducted, people are first screened to determine their vaccine status, once this has been established, your vaccination status dictates the cycle threshold used when performing the actual PCR test. If you are vaccinated, low C.T. are used, and when you are unvaccinated, very high C.T. are used, and one can see how this impacts the outcome.
Near the end of 2020 and early spring of 2021, there were talks of scrapping the PCR test due to unreliable results. This discussion was simply dropped from the radar, and I think the PCR test became an effective tool to assist in their campaign. This sounds very much like conspiracy theory; even as I write it, I wonder if this is nothing more than speculation and gossip circulating out there in either. But as I have learned during all this, the most extreme information that sounds like pure B.S. has been turning out to be true. But the C.D.C. themselves are recommending higher thresholds be used for those who are not vaccinated. There seems to be this vale of secrecy throughout this COVID situation. Secret contracts signed with big Pharma, secret talks between the government and big tech, and politicians who all seem to be told to toe the line of fear for your pension.
I will continue to look into this further, and I will report back what I find, but like I keep saying, nothing surprises me anymore. Are we now simply tracking variants of the FLU? From all data reports, the flu has been eradicated, where 2020 was predicted to be a very bad year of the flu, have we now simply replaced the flu with COVID. We have never tracked the flu in this aggressive and hyper-focused manner. If we started testing people for the flu in the same way we are now with COVID, I suspect we would see the same results.
Just some other notes to think about: •According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window. How convenient •The C.D.C. also has two different sets of testing guidelines — one for vaccinated patients and another for the unvaccinated. If you’re unvaccinated, C.D.C. guidance says to use a cycle threshold (C.T.) of 40, known to result in false positives. If you’re vaccinated, they recommend using a CT of 28 or less, which minimizes the risk of false positives
•The C.D.C. also hides vaccine failures and props up the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative by only counting breakthrough cases that result in hospitalization or death. •Hospitals are still also reporting non-COVID related illnesses as COVID-19 •Agencies are counting anyone who died within the first 14 days post-injection as unvaccinated. Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks. So you see, there is so much at play here and so many situations knowingly distorted. By reporting is this way, we not only artificially increase the number of deaths of the unvaccinated, but we also hide the fact that these deaths may be due to the vaccine itself since their deaths counted as unvaccinated deaths rather than being counted as deaths due to vaccine injury or COVID-19 breakthrough infections.
So as you can see, there seems to be this never-ending pipeline of scandal and misinformation that keeps me busy. It’s not like I am actually looking for dirt; it just seems to be so prevalent that you need to be looking for it. But this all goes unnoticed for the most part because so many people have grown up to trust the government and our health officials and are above the pitfalls and greed we see in private business.
In time, when this all settles, there will be years of public inquiries, law suites and judicial inquests. I see charges of bribery, conspiracy and pretty much anything one could expect when there are billions of dollars and so much political power at the offering.
If you haven’t already, please check out the Uncensored Podcast. You can find us on iTunes, Amazon, Android, Google and Spotify. Click the Subscribe button below.
One thought on “Vaccine Math – Stupidity!”
Globally people are starting to smell a rat with the enire vaccine thing.
I read a news article earlier that said the booster will give immunity for 5 to 10 years as the reason to get it. Fauci is pretty keen to make booster shots mandated yet courts have ruled that vaccine mandates are not on. So what makes the booster different regards mandates?
My question is if the first 2 shots have waning protection then why would more of it make much of a difference?
Considering the vaccine was going to make you immune, then it was going to provide protection, then it went back to immunity, then back again, and now it is booster shots with the addendum that they, the medical experts, actually don’t know what will happen so they just want to “suck it and see”, but it will give immunity … maybe.
Colour me crazy but isn’t that wishy washy?