Questioning Everything about the Vaccine

A pretty alarming case study and report have been published by some pretty smart individuals. It was an incredibly dry and difficult read. So what I tried to do is break it down into easier to understand plain language with hopes of sharing this in a manner that won’t sprain any brains as I did to mine when I read the 42 small-print page report.

Senior scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and Naturopathic oncology specialist Dr. Greg Nigh have made some pretty alarming discoveries and recommendations.

To date, over 6100 people have been reported to have died due to the vaccine. This was compiled using VAERs data and compiled on August 19, 2021. It is worth mentioning that there are deaths that go unreported, therefore this number could be higher, perhaps as high as 10,000. It is also worth mentioning, the CDC has already been suspected of tampering with the VAERs data, removing many reported injuries.

In the remainder of this post, I will try to make sense of the study I read, which analyzes the possible pathways in which the experimental mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna could be causing serious adverse effects in vaccinated individuals.

One notable vaccine side effect is called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is brought on by the spike proteins produced in the human body via the mRNA injection. To explain this in English, many vaccines work by inducing neutralizing antibodies, this is good. However, not all antibody responses are created equal. Sometimes antibodies do not prevent cell entry and, on rare occasions, they may actually increase the ability of a virus to enter cells and cause a worsening of disease through a mechanism called antibody-dependent enhancement. This is why some are theorizing the COVID vaccine may in itself be responsible for the new variants we have been seeing.

The mRNA vaccines ultimately deliver the highly foreign spike protein to what we will call “bad” or “infected” cells. As such, cloned antibodies that fight against the spike protein are the expected outcome of the currently deployed mRNA vaccines.

Mass vaccination policy has generally proceeded on the assumption that the risk/benefit ratio for the vaccines is a ‘slam dunk.’ With the massive vaccination campaign in response to the declared international emergency of COVID, we have rushed into vaccine experiments on a worldwide scale and as described below, we are the in a way become the experiment.

With all the new data out there we should learn more about this new and previously untested technology. Today’s routinely recommended vaccines do not cause ADE. If they did, like those described above, would be removed from use. Phase III clinical trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use, but unfortunately, these trials are being conducted now with millions and millions of people.

There are several things aspects to this entire management and delivery of the new mRNA vaccines, which by the way are not vaccines, I am only using vaccines since that is what it has been coined as.

Many aspects of Covid-19 and subsequent vaccine development are unprecedented for a vaccine deployed for use in the general population.

  • This is the first time to use mRNA vaccine technology.
  • First time Moderna has brought any product to the market.
  • First to have public health officials telling those receiving the vaccination to expect an adverse reaction.
  • First to be implemented publicly with nothing more than preliminary efficacy data.
  • The first vaccine to make no clear claims about reducing infections, transmissibility, or deaths.
  • First coronavirus vaccine ever attempted in humans
  • The first injection of genetically modified polynucleotides (DNA stuff) in the general population

Another fact known about this type of vaccine development that has had little or no discussion is the following. Vaccines are divided into three categories: Simple, Complex, and Unprecedented. Simple and Complex vaccines represented standard and modified applications of existing vaccine technologies. Unprecedented represents a category of a vaccine against a disease for which there has never before been a suitable vaccine.

Now, this part is important and should be understood by everyone as it is perhaps the basis for perhaps everything that seems to be going wrong with this vaccine. Vaccines are expected to take 12.5 years to develop. Even more ominously, they have a 5% estimated chance of making it through Phase II trials where its efficacy is established, and, of that 5%, a 40% chance of making it through Phase III trials which is where the assessment of population benefit is determined. In other words, an unprecedented vaccine is predicted to have a 2% probability of success at the stage of Phase III clinical trial. So it becomes abundantly obvious that there is a low probability of success, especially for unprecedented vaccines.

On May 10, 2021, Pfizer trials were deemed to be good to go with a “reported” despite prior serious baseline issues that would have normally be grounds for exclusion. For these and other reasons the interim efficacy estimate of around 95% for both vaccines is suspect and to this day have yet to answer.

So more analysis that looked specifically at the issues found many flaws and steps missed in the release of the vaccine however there are critical questions that have yet to be answered to the vaccine safety and their efficacy.

  • Will Vaccines Stimulate the Immune Response?
  • Will Vaccines Provide Sustainable Immune Endurance?
  • How Will SARS-CoV-2 Mutate?
  • Are We Prepared for Vaccine Backfires?

There has been a lot of information that is pointing to the mRNA design is somewhat flawed and not unfolding as expected as witnessed and reported in the recent issues questioning its lack of effectiveness. The Coles Notes of it is that this is due to the spike protein not behaving as expected and this is bad, very bad, and would have been caught in phase III studies.

There were 15 pages describing this using words that looked like something I have never seen and I had to perform a ton of interpretation to distill it down to this one paragraph. One topic I found interesting, to say the least, was the section on spike protein toxicity, but that alone was another 5 pages of pure science and big words.

Experimental mRNA vaccines have been heralded as having the potential for great benefits, but they also harbour the possibility of potentially tragic and even catastrophic unforeseen consequences and these seem to be tricking out in posts and reports all over the world.

The mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been implemented with great fanfare and support from the media and government as this was very much a political weapon. However, there are many aspects of their widespread is cause for concern. We have discussed a few here but trust me, there is much much more, but I will leave that to those with more brainpower.

In order to adequately rule out the adverse potentialities, it has been recommended by many doctors, scientists and virologists, at a minimum, that some fundamental surveillance practices be adopted. As a national effort to collect detailed data on adverse events associated with the mRNA vaccines and repeated autoantibody testing of the vaccine-recipient population to name just two, and one that stands out would be in vitro studies to assess whether the mRNA can negatively affect the reproductivity in men.

But here we are today, as more and more side effects are reported, it has become a wait-and-see to determine if we keep proceeding blindly, without proper testing trials, or do we as some have suggested pause the rollout and reassess everything.

I truly feel, based on what I have read and learned, this may end up being the year we infected the population with something that will cause great harm to not only those who received it, but to those who come into close contact with them. Will the vaccine passport become the mechanism of how we avoid the vaccinated to avoid contamination of the DNA of those who resisted getting the “JAB”?

Leave a Reply