For days, the mainstream media have been playing a loop of reports that 99% of COVID-19 deaths are among unvaccinated people. Besides there is no data —there’s actually evidence that the opposite is true – it’s become the basis for a stream of dehumanizing propaganda that labels half of the American adult population and most children who haven’t taken experimental COVID-19 shots as “variant factories” and “incubators” of disease but what they fail to tell us is that the data they are using to formulate this latest narrative is based on some pretty sketchy and what I like to call Covid Science.
They based this narrative on data that was taken from around when many were still not fully vaccinated and do not include the most up-to-date data that would have most certainly resulted in a completely different set of findings. There are more holes in their study, too many to post all here, but here is that stands out. The Provincetown study included people who were partially vaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown, which could have biased the results. This raises the question of whether the data from the Provincetown outbreak, which featured a “very specific set of circumstances,” should have been used as a basis. How did they make this mistake? Are they this stupid or was this a brilliantly planned calculated CNN-style tactic whereby, put the narrative out there, get momentum behind so it takes on a life of its own, regardless of the corrections made later? When will more people start to do some basic research and see that we are being played.