Leaky Vaccines

Leaky Vaccine – Who is really at risk?
I have been worried about something that I keep seeing show up while researching mRNAs concerning their inherent design flaw. As we know and have seen through reports, the mRNA does not make us immune to the disease, nor does it protect us from spreading it and this is called a leaky vaccine and this is the concern. Could this vaccine, the mRNA specifically, drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens? Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population.

This is not a new theory, this has been around for over decades, and was put to test many times, specifically in the case of Marek’s disease. A virus in poultry showed that modern commercial leaky vaccines have precisely this effect in that they allow the onward transmission of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. The plausibility of this idea has been confirmed with mathematical models. This has not been discussed or tabled for discussion up until now since up until now, most vaccines are sterilizing (transmission-blocking) or not in widespread use. Also, sadly, for reasons far beyond me, unambiguous comparisons of strain virulence and the impact of vaccination on transmission require experimental infections in the natural host—clearly impossible for human diseases.

In the case of the Merek’s disease, which has been evolving in poultry immunized with leaky anti-disease vaccines since the introduction of the first vaccines in the 1970s and has continued to plague the industry since.
Now that we have this new mRNA vaccine, that was implemented worldwide, and in terms of long-term side effects, we have yet to determine and know little about it, are we going to see what happened with Merek’s repeat itself here?
Are these new variants that seem to be popping up due to the vaccinated? Are we going to be faced with a new pandemic of millions of people who have by way of the mRNA, become a living and breathing disease mutating machine?

In the example of the Marek’s disease, a minor ailment that did little harm to chickens in the 1950s, but the virus has grown stronger and today is capable of killing all the unvaccinated birds in poultry flocks, sometimes within 10 days. Is this what we face? Is this why the CDC is asking everyone to get vaccinated whereby we no longer rely on our natural immunity system but now rely on injections of mRNA therapies and booster shots for our remaining lives?

I have found the reason we are starting to develop these next-generation vaccines that are ‘leaky’ because they are for diseases that do not do a good job of producing strong natural immunity — diseases like HIV and malaria,”

I know this topic is out there, but it’s topics like these that seem to rear their head only when we ignore their possibility of it going from perhaps today a conspiracy theory to a sobering reality.

I think the time has come for a serious conversation about what a vaccine is and what it is supposed to do. By definition, a vaccine is “a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.”

If your product is not conveying immunity, then can your product be considered a vaccine?

By definition, and I have said this before, a vaccine is “a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.”

If your product is not conveying immunity, then can your product be considered a vaccine?

For example, when I was a young boy, I received the measles vaccine. Did you know that the World Health Organization recognizes four predominant measles genotypes currently circulating worldwide? They are D8, B3, H1, and D4. When you include the variants within those genotypes, there is 24 total.
How many times have I gotten measles? Zero.
How many boosters have I received? Zero.

How many people did I infect with measles after my vaccination? Zero.

I suggest that, just perhaps, it is not the viral mutations that are the reason for the failures. Instead, the experimental vaccines are not performing as vaccines should. The current formulations should be viewed more as therapeutic agents. They appear to alleviate the worst of the COVID symptoms and enhance the chances of survival in severe cases.

And one interesting thing the CDC just posted was this, “COVID-19 may be “just a few mutations away from being able to evade vaccines, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky warned. So brow-beating people certainly isn’t likely to inspire them to get vaccinated. And if the CDC says mutations will render them ineffective and vaccinated people have to be masked, why would anyone bother to get a vaccine…that is experimental.

It’s worth mentioning, It took a while for these effects to be seen, though. They often did not occur immediately, which bodes ominously for the future of humanity as far as Chinese Virus vaccines are concerned. The case of the Marek’s disease study makes it very clear that non-sterilizing vaccines, which include Chinese Virus injections, do not kill pathogens. Consequently, they put selective pressure on said pathogens to mutate.

So in summary, one thing we do know is that the vaccinated are spreading the virus, and I would like to know, is the virus they are passing on the same as the one they got infected with or are they spreading more virulent versions?

Leave a Reply